jump to navigation

1908 ascent of Mt Erebus recalled 10 March 2008

Posted by volcanism in Antarctica, Erebus, anniversaries, history of volcanology, volcano culture.
add a comment

On 10 March 1908 members of the British Imperial Antarctic Expedition (also known as the Nimrod Expedition) climbed the active Antarctic volcano Mount Erebus on Ross Island, the first people to make the ascent to the crater rim. The 100th anniversary of this achievement is being marked today at the Mount Erebus Volcano Observatory, which is run by New Mexico Tech at the very un-Antarctic location of Socorro, New Mexico.

Information
Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program - summary information for Mount Erebus
MEVO - Mount Erebus Volcano Observatory
Antarctic Explorers: Ernest Shackleton - detailed biography, includes an account of the Nimrod Expedition

News
Erebus ascent recalled - Stuff.co.nz, 10 March 2008

The Volcanism Blog

NOVA Geoblog on the Antarctic subglacial volcano 24 January 2008

Posted by volcanism in Antarctica, blogs, climate, current research, volcanology.
add a comment

There’s an excellent post at NOVA Geoblog on the Antarctica subglacial volcano: ‘New below-ice volcano in Antarctica’. Have a good look around, while you’re there: NOVA Geoblog, put together by Callan Bentley at Northern Virginia Community College, is one of the best geoscience blogs around.

(For background on the Antarctica subglacial volcano see the earlier posts here.)

The Volcanism Blog

That Antarctic volcano again 22 January 2008

Posted by volcanism in Antarctica, climate, current research, volcanology.
add a comment

The new British study arguing that a subglacial volcanic eruption occurred in Antarctica two millennia or so ago and that the volcano responsible may still be active beneath the ice sheet has made a big splash in the world’s media, partly because of the ‘global warming’ aspect. The researchers, David Vaughan and Hugh Corr of the British Antarctic Survey were very careful in what they said about the relationship between subglacial volcanism and the overall melting of the Antarctic ice sheet, as National Geographic reports:

‘The presence of the volcano adds [to] the complexity of an issue that I thought we were getting on top of,’ Vaughan said. Western Antarctica ‘is losing ice to the oceans, and the volcano could be contributing to that effect.’ But it can only be responsible for a fraction of that change, he added, since the volcano only affects the nearby Pine Island Glacier. Global warming is still the main culprit behind the overall loss of ice from western Antarctica, researchers say.

Last month another study suggested that a ‘hot spot’ beneath north-eastern Greenland was contributing to the melting of the Greenland ice sheet. It seems unlikely that atmospheric global warming will be toppled from its place as the primary explanatory paradigm for the melting of the world’s ice sheets, but the mechanisms at work are more complex than perhaps has hitherto been suspected. The role of geological heating beneath the polar icecaps is clearly something that has to be investigated in more detail.

A round-up of news stories on the Antarctic eruption is given below. Do take a few minutes to read ’Cataclysmic volcano awakens in Antarctica’ at the Croatian site Javno.org. It’s hilarious. [Edit, 23 January 2008: I see Javno have removed the story, out of embarrassment one hopes. You can still enjoy it via the Google cache version, Highly Allochthonous. As someone who has published in academic journals in the humanities I find the discussion of scholarly publication in the sciences interesting, especially the suspicion with which the Nature empire is viewed. There's no parallel for this in my own home discipline of history, and nor is there (in my experience at least) much sense of a hierarchy of journals, outside the real top tier. Indeed, there's sometimes a perverse pride in publishing something in as obscure a journal as you can find - shows you're radical, cutting-edge, etc. Specialism is important: we all know more and more about less and less. It also happens to be the case that in this postmodern age a lot of what passes for scholarship in humanities and social science journals is utter drivel; a phenomenon rather less prevalent, I hope and believe, in the sciences.]

Information
Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program - summary information for the Hudson Mountains (1900-028)
Antarctica Volcanoes and Volcanics - information from the United States Geological Survey

News
First evidence of under-ice volcanic eruption in Antarctica - British Antarctic Survey press release, 20 January 2008
Under-ice volcano eruption spewed ice over Antarctica - National Geographic News, 21 January 2008
First evidence of under-ice volcanic eruption in Antarctica - ScienceDaily, 21 January 2008
Scientists find active volcano in Antarctica - New York Times, 21 January 2008
Cataclysmic volcano awakens in Antarctica - Javno.org, 21 January 2008 [for entertainment only; original page removed, so the link now points to the Google cache copy.]

The Volcanism Blog

More on the Antarctic subglacial eruption 21 January 2008

Posted by volcanism in Antarctica, current research, volcanology.
add a comment

The news service at New Scientist, for which a subscription to the magazine is not required, has a good report today on the Antarctic subglacial eruption study (see earlier post): ‘First subglacial eruption found in Antarctica’. The article observes that the Antarctic eruption some 2000 years ago would have been similar in size to the subglacial eruption at the Icelandic volcano Grímsvötn in November 2004; it also claims that there is already one known subglacial volcano in antarctica, Mount Casertz:

Although the new volcano is probably the most recent one to have exploded, researchers have known about another subglacial volcano in Antarctica for some time. Mount Casertz stands some 600 metres high, but the only sign of its existence from the surface is a large depression in the ice above caused by heat from the active cone melting the ice.

A side-issue: it’s very disappointing to find an article published under the New Scientist title (albeit not in the journal itself) linking to Wikipedia entries. Why link to the Wikipedia articles on the volcanoes Grímsvötn and Mount Erebus when the Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program is just as easily accessible and possesses all the virtues of reliability, stability, consistency and authority that Wikipedia lacks?

Catherine Brahic, ‘First subglacial eruption found in Antarctica’, New Scientist Environment, 21 January 2008

The Volcanism Blog

Subglacial volcanic eruption took place in Antarctica around 2000 years ago, new study suggests 20 January 2008

Posted by volcanism in Antarctica, current research, volcanology.
add a comment

The editors of the new Nature journal Nature Geoscience must be delighted: a paper from their first issue - in fact it’s an ‘advanced online publication’ - has made the mainstream media with its claim from a British Antarctic Survey team that a subglacial volcano erupted in the Antarctic around 2,200 years ago. The paper itself is subscription-only, but the first paragraph is available as an abstract on the journal’s website:

Indirect evidence suggests that volcanic activity occurring beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet influences ice flow and sheet stability. However, only volcanoes that protrude through the ice sheet and those inferred from geophysical techniques have been mapped so far. Here we analyse radar data from the Hudson Mountains, West Antarctica, that contain reflections from within the ice that had previously been interpreted erroneously as the ice-sheet bed. We show that the reflections are present within an elliptical area of about 23,000 km2 that contains tephra from an explosive volcanic eruption. The tephra layer is thickest at a subglacial topographic high, which we term the Hudson Mountains Subglacial Volcano. The layer depth dates the eruption at 207 BC plusminus 240 years, which matches exceptionally strong but previously unattributed conductivity signals in nearby ice cores. The layer contains 0.019–0.31 km3 of tephra, which implies a volcanic explosive index of 3–4. Production and episodic release of water from the volcano probably affected ice flow at the time of the eruption. Ongoing volcanic heat production may have implications for contemporary ice dynamics in this glacial system.

Recent active volcanism in the Hudson Mountains has been suspected, but remains unconfirmed. If the findings of this study are confirmed there would be significant implications for our understanding of Antarctic volcanism, and in particular of the possible role of subglacial volcanism in the dynamics of the Antarctic ice-sheet.

Information
Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program - summary information for the Hudson Mountains (1900-028)

News
Massive volcano exploded under Antarctic icesheet, study finds - AFP, 20 January 2008
Antarctic eruption noted - BBC News, 20 January 2008
First evidence of under-ice volcanic eruption in Antarctica - PhysOrg.com, 20 January 2008

The Volcanism Blog